Zhou Z, Cunningham E, Lennon A, McCarthy HO, Buchanan F, Dunne N (2018) Development of three-dimensional printing polymer-ceramic scaffolds with enhanced compressive properties and tuneable resorption. (200101)3:1/23.0.CO 2-Hĭerby B (2015) Additive manufacture of ceramics components by inkjet printing. Knitter R, Bauer W, Göhring D, Haußelt J (2001) Manufacturing of ceramic microcomponents by a rapid prototyping process chain.
Zanchetta E, Cattaldo M, Franchin G, Schwentenwein M, Homa J, Brusatin G, Colombo P (2016) Stereolithography of SiOC ceramic microcomponents. Izu N, Shin W, Matsubara I, Murayama N (2006) Evaluation of response characteristics of resistive oxygen sensors based on porous cerium oxide thick film using pressure modulation method. Kulwicki BM (1984) Ceramic sensors and transducers. Van Noort R (2012) The future of dental devices is digital. Įbert J, Özkol E, Zeichner A, Uibel K, Weiss Ö, Koops U, Telle R, Fischer H (2009) Direct inkjet printing of dental prostheses made of zirconia. Marro A, Bandukwala T, Mak W (2016) Three-dimensional printing and medical imaging: a review of the methods and applications. Īrslan-Yildiz A, Assal RE, Chen P, Guven S, Inci F, Demirci U (2016) Towards artificial tissue models: past, present, and future of 3D bioprinting.
įahmy MD, Jazayeri HE, Razavi M, Masri R, Tayebi L (2016) Three-dimensional bioprinting materials with potential application in preprosthetic surgery: 3D printing materials in preprosthetic surgery. Ho CMB, Ng SH, Yoon YJ (2015) A review on 3D printed bioimplants. Įlahinia MH, Hashemi M, Tabesh M, Bhaduri SB (2012) Manufacturing and processing of NiTi implants: a review. Yan Q, Dong H, Su J, Han H, Song B, Wei Q, Shi (2018) A review of 3D printing technology for medical applications. Missouri State Medical Association 115:75–81 Paul GM, Rezaienia A, Wen P, Condoor S, Parkar N, King W (2018) Medical applications for 3D printing: recent developments. Ventola CL (2014) Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. īuj-Corral I, Petit-Rojo O, Bagheri A, Minguella-Canela J (2017) Modelling of porosity of 3D printed ceramic prostheses with grid structure. (Accessed Mai 20, 2020).įaes M, Valkenaers H, Vogeler F, Vleugels J, Ferraris E (2015) Extrusion-based 3D printing of ceramic components. ISO/ASTM 52900:2015(en), Additive manufacturing - general principles - terminology. This brings a new concept into the mechanical design field for 3D printers, which is in line with the technological trends prevalent in the industry.Ĭhen Z, Li Z, Li J, Liu C, Liu C, Li Y, Wang P, Yi H, Lao C, Yuelong F (2019) 3D printing of ceramics: a review. After that, the 3D CAD environment was used to combine the strength of Pugh’s method and the design space. Pugh concept analysis was used to select the optimum design shape. The holding system allows the fixing of the syringe in order to perform printing with ceramic material.
The syringes are automatically transferred to the holding system using an arm. The automatic syringe loading system, which is operational to manually receive several syringes of the same or different volumes, allows the syringe feeding system to be loaded and unloaded once the syringe is empty. The proposed extrusion model enables printing with a loader with different syringes simultaneously, without stopping the operational process while switching the syringe. To address the current deficiencies, a new extrusion system is designed for a 3D printing machine for ceramics that is compatible with different low-cost, open-source 3D printers. However, the assurance of performance criteria of the extrusion system for simultaneous usage becomes the major challenge for most direct ink writing (DIW) platforms, for instance for printing large parts, for multi-material printing, to decrease printing time, and to increase efficiency in terms of motor usage and weight of the extruders. Thus, since the development of 3D printing, direct ink writing (DIW) is one of the most promising and inexpensive techniques for shaping free-form ceramic medical components such as prostheses or dental implants from liquids or pastes. Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies are an appropriate alternative to obtain the complex shapes of implants, which can have porous structures. On the contrary, machining ceramic components is difficult, owing to their extreme hardness and brittleness. The introduction of ceramic materials in the medical field is becoming a vital necessity because of its stable physicochemical characteristics, high biocompatibility, and good osteoconductivity.
0 kommentar(er)
